As we
enter 2014, nurses who are being investigated by the Ohio Board of Nursing
and/or who are facing pending disciplinary charges brought by the Board must
know that this version of the Board is stricter than any version of the Board I
have seen since I started representing nurses in 1999. The proof is in the relatively harsh Consent
Agreements and Adjudication Orders adopted by the Board during 2013 and the
increased reluctance of the Board to settle cases using terms and conditions
that were common prior to 2013. The
proof is also in the fact that the Board currently takes more cases to hearing
when nurses will not accept the harsher settlement terms that the Board has
recently been insisting upon in its proposed Consent Agreements.
Instead
of having 1 full time Hearing Examiner and using 1-2 contract Hearing
Examiner’s as needed, the Board now has 3 full time Hearing Examiner’s and
consistently uses 3 contract Hearing Examiners in an attempt to keep up with
what seems to be an ever increasing number of cases that go to hearing instead
of settling through a Consent Agreement.
What
does this mean for nurses who are being investigated by the Ohio Board of Nursing
and/or who face pending disciplinary charges by the Board? Quite simply, you will be engaged in a
struggle with the Board to obtain the most lenient sanction possible through a
Consent Agreement and you may be forced to take your case to hearing to try to
obtain a better outcome than is being offered through Consent Agreement. To make it through that struggle and obtain a
positive outcome for your nursing license, you will need to know who to
communicate with, who to avoid communicating with and how to leverage positive
facts in presenting your defense to the Board.
You will also need to be patient in negotiating the terms of a Consent
Agreement with the Board (the Board’s first offer is not usually its best
offer) and you will need to be willing, if necessary, to take your case to
hearing if the Board is being unreasonable in negotiating a Consent
Agreement.
The Ohio Board of Nursing met on January 16-17,
2014. The Board voted to approve Consent Agreements to resolve the
charges pending against numerous nursing clients of Graff & McGovern.
Most of those Consent Agreements were hard fought and took 3-6 months to
negotiate the reasonable outcomes. The Board
also deliberated upon numerous Reports and Recommendations to resolve charges
against nurses whose cases went to hearing instead of having the charges
resolved through a Consent Agreement. The Board’s Adjudication Orders in
those cases stuck with the recent trend of imposing harsher sanctions than in
years past and illustrated the fact that the Board is not obligated to follow
the Hearing Examiner’s Recommendations.
No comments:
Post a Comment